Arguments Blog
Thursday, Oct 31, 2013, 11:46 AM

Was Hiding the ACA’s Redistribution a Bad Idea?

Jack Meserve

Josh Barro had a good post yesterday arguing the private health insurance market is so heavily regulated and subsidized that it’s a de facto government program run through private companies. Instead of a progressive fiscal program being performed by tax collection and benefit distribution, it’s through tax subsidies to some and not others. He’s right about this, but he left out a point that explains a lot of the outrage about rate increases (David Frum’s premiums went up around 30 percent for a comparable plan.)

Imagine an alternate universe where we were implementing food stamps for the first time. Instead of increasing taxes on higher tax brackets to pay for it, the government set up a special computer system at grocery stores. Each time someone in those higher tax brackets stepped up to the cashier, their prices would be 30 percent more than they’d been paying. That same price would then be subtracted from poorer people’s grocery bills. Seeing the same groceries you bought last month ago jump from $100 to $130 would make even the most sanguine of bleeding-heart liberals grumble about how terrible that god damn Obama-stamp program was.

The point being, this is the rare case where hiding a tax increase probably makes the policy it’s supporting less popular. People see transactions in private markets (or what appear to be private markets) as separate from the responsibilities owed to others. Hiding redistribution in private product’s price increases siphons any of the communitarian spirit that citizens get from paying taxes in the first place.

 

COMMENTS: 1 • TAGS:
return to ARGUMENTS home
 
Post a Comment

Don Khan:

At this stage of implementation it us hard to be so definitive. It is difficulty seeing the Affordable Care Act being anything but a net positive for American Society. I do not see any attempts on anyone's part to hide anything. Let's let the enrollment process continue, before all of us become critiques. The end result will
be high quality, affordable healthcare for all.
t is sick to equate an effort designed to do good and save lives, to events that have already occured, and clearly took lives, hurting people in horrific ways.

Nov 16, 2013, 9:24 PM

Post a Comment

Name

Email

Comments (you may use HTML tags for style)

Verification

Note: Several minutes will pass while the system is processing and posting your comment. Do not resubmit during this time or your comment will post multiple times.