Editor's Note

A Message to Our Readers

What could be more anachronistic in the media culture and political climate of 2006 than the founding of a quarterly journal of ideas? In light of the venomous screeds, discourses on "framing" and political positioning, or any of the other obsessions…

By Kenneth Baer and Andrei Cherny

What could be more anachronistic–in the media culture and political climate of 2006;than the founding of a quarterly journal of ideas? In light of the venomous screeds, discourses on “framing” and political positioning, or any of the other obsessions progressives have adopted of late, who would think that there was an appetite for a meaningful discussion devoted to facts and the basic questions of progressive philosophy? It’s almost as if we were to announce the return of poodle skirts and pet-rocks. But we believe that, to regenerate the strength of the progressive movement, big ideas are vitally important. And Democracy represents our bet–and the bet of our supporters–that they will matter.

National Review “stands athwart history, yelling Stop,” wrote William F. Buckley in its first issue. The conservative consensus forged, to a large extent, in those pages–along with the neoconservative ideas that came out of the Public Interest, Commentary, and the National Interest–was built on a foundation of serious thinking by serious people grappling with essential questions about how the world works and how it should work. They embarked on this process in order to challenge the dominance of New Deal progressivism. And four decades later, the consensus and the ideas developed in those journals and honed over the years have transformed America.

Yet we launch this endeavor at a time when American politics has
grown profoundly unserious. As they have amassed more power for
themselves than at any point in nearly a century, conservatives have
grown tired in their thinking as it’s become clear that their ideas have
failed. But instead of stepping into the breach with a coherent
response, many progressives have adopted a compulsive fixation on
electoral posturing and crafting the message of the day. Progressives
too often have come to eschew bold ambition, preferring to take shelter
in the safe harbor of “realism” and “competence.”

The times demand more. We are undergoing a profound transformation
in our economy, in the nature of global realities and national security
threats, and the character of American democracy and society. This
transformation has rendered obsolete the comfortable assumptions of the
1930s, the 1960s, the 1980s–and even the 1990s. As progressives have
during previous times of similar flux, we must craft a response that
moves beyond the mere criticism of the right wing or a rigid adherence
to the past. We need a twenty-first-century progressivism that builds
on our proud history, is true to our central values, and is relevant to
our times.

Progressives have been at their best when we face the future bravely
and optimistically; when we are both rigorous in looking at the world
as it is and vigorous in introducing creative approaches to remake the
world as we believe it should be. Democracy is neither
interested in reiterating the conventional wisdom nor in maintaining
unity around outdated orthodoxies. We do not seek to publish policy
papers or political plans; we’ll leave the budget line items and
electoral strategies to others.

Rather, Democracy will serve as a place where ideas can be
developed and important debates can be spurred. We see our role as
upsetting accepted assumptions and pushing the boundaries of what is
accepted by, and expected from, progressives. We believe that many of
the old cleavages that divided progressives in the last century have
been rendered irrelevant and, if you agree, we hope you’ll comment on
the pieces you read here, offer new ideas and arguments, and enter the
debate. Now is the time to fashion a new progressivism for the
twenty-first century and we welcome all who are willing to join in this
conversation.

Conservative ideas have dominated our national discourse for most of
a generation. No more. The world and this nation are changing too fast
to allow for ideologues who will take us backward. But neither do they
allow for those timid souls who are satisfied with, or cowed into,
protecting an ever-smaller inheritance from being whittled away.
Instead, we need to rejuvenate progressivism and send it back on the
march with bold ambition to change America and the world for the
better. At Democracy, we stand athwart history and yell, Forward!

Kenneth Baer and Andrei Cherny are the founders of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas.

Also by this author

Democracy at 10

Click to

View Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus